A pull that stops halfway across a river does not stop because the machine ran out of strength. It stops because the oil reached 90 °C, the relief valve lifted, and the operator lost the ability to hold tension while the conductor hung in the span. The number that predicts this is not the maximum pull on the quotation sheet; it is the continuous pulling force, and the duty cycle behind it.
On short sections, a contractor can tolerate overheating: stop, let the oil cool, restart. On a 900 m crossing or a long straight run between two tension towers, stopping is expensive and sometimes unsafe. The conductor is suspended, the traffic or navigation window is ticking, and restarting a partially sagged conductor risks snatching and slip. So the real question on site is not "how hard can this machine pull" but "how long can this machine hold this pull without derating".
Pulling power is force times speed. At 2.5 km/h, which is 0.69 m/s, a 100 kN pull requires about 69 kW at the rope; 120 kN requires 83 kW; 250 kN requires 174 kW. Every kilowatt lost in pump, motor and relief valve becomes heat in the hydraulic oil, and the cooler must reject that heat continuously.
| Duty point | Line pull | Speed | Rope power | Thermal consequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilot rope only | 20 to 25 kN | 5 km/h | 28 to 35 kW | Cooler holds temperature easily |
| Normal conductor pull | 100 kN | 2.5 km/h | ~69 kW | Steady rise to 60 to 70 °C |
| Heavy sustained pull | 120 kN | 2.5 km/h | ~83 kW | Cooler capacity becomes decisive |
| High-capacity quad pull | 250 kN | 2.5 km/h | ~174 kW | Continuous duty only with full cooling |
| Breakaway peak | 280 kN | <1 km/h | ~78 kW | Minutes only, relief-limited |
Once oil passes about 80 °C, viscosity falls, internal leakage rises and the machine derates itself: the same pressure setting produces less rope pull and more heat. Above 90 °C seals harden and pump life falls sharply. That is the mechanism behind a pull that "just gets slower" and then stops.
Published specifications show the gap clearly. The SA-QY60 lists 60 kN maximum intermittent pull against 50 kN maximum continuous, with 2.5 km/h at max pull, 5 km/h maximum speed and 25 kN available at maximum speed. The SA-QY120 lists 120 kN intermittent against 100 kN continuous, 50 kN at maximum speed, on a 129 kW (173 hp) engine. The SA-QY150 moves to 150 kN intermittent, 120 kN continuous and 60 kN at maximum speed. The GS280 states 280 kN maximum tractive force against 250 kN maximum sustained traction at 2.5 km/h, with corresponding tension 120 kN.
The pattern is consistent: continuous capability sits at roughly 80 to 85 percent of the peak, and the pull available at maximum speed is lower again, typically 40 to 50 percent of peak. A specification that quotes only a peak figure is telling you what the relief valve is set to, not what the machine can do for an hour.
Compare the published sustained ratings of the SA-QY60 60 kN puller, the SA-QY120 120 kN puller, the SA-QY150 150 kN puller and the GS280 280 kN machine before specifying for a long crossing.
It means a higher relief setting. Structure, pump displacement and cooling capacity decide what the machine can sustain, and that is the number that finishes a long section.
Investigate at 75 °C, reduce load at 80 °C and stop at 85 to 90 °C. Continuing past that turns a routine pull into a pump repair.
Only marginally. A higher viscosity index oil delays the derate but does not add cooler capacity, so the steady state limit stays where the radiator puts it.
İlgili kişi: Mr. Marble Wu
Tel: 8613301534008